PB_CRA
Mortgage Finance, Mortgage Default & Foreclosure, Regulation & Reform
Policy Brief | July 2010

CRA Did Not Cause the Foreclosure Crisis

This policy brief provides ample evidence that the 1977 legislation designed to prevent discrimination in financial services did not contribute to the financial crisis.

Share
Print
Adjust font size

The claim that the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) led to the foreclosure crisis is a falsehood that persists despite irrefutable evidence to the contrary and repeated attempts to correct the misperception.

This policy brief reviews the large body of evidence that show clearly CRA and its policy to expand home lending did not cause the foreclosure crisis.

Clear evidence shows that CRA covered only a small fraction of mortgage lending, including risky subprime lending and mortgage-backed securities, in the years leading up to the foreclosure crisis. Further, CRA loans are less likely to default than loans by less-regulated lenders.

The lesson from this evidence is that sustainable homeownership depends on the quality of the loan product. CRA promoted safe and sound lending to low-income borrowers, but the law failed to keep pace with changes in mortgage lending, such as the rise of the secondary market and independent mortgage companies. Less-scrupulous lenders were able to exploit the uneven playing field during the housing boom.

Preventing another crisis requires policies that promote constructive lending and are universally applied.

The UNC Center for Community Capital conducts research and policy analysis on ways to make financial services work better for more people and communities.

 

© 2014 UNC Center for Community Capital
1700 Martin Luther King Blvd., Suite 129 • CB#3452, Chapel Hill NC 27599-3452 • 919.843.2140 • 877.783.2359 • communitycapital@unc.edu